Off-site Links

To Legislation and Other Information

THOMAS.gov

Bill Data--The Library of Congress

The Congressional Budget Office

Non-partisan  Budget & Spending Information

The White House

NEWSPAPERS

National and International Resources We Use

PollingReport.com

Does Your Opinion

Match the Polls?


Legislation News & Report (TM) 

TheWeekInCongress.com (TM)

Managing America: Government


 Home

Contact: House / Senate

Newest Public Laws

Monthly  Budget Review

Perspective

Contact Us

Legal

Previous Edition

Search & Research

Archives

Legislation in the Spotlight

Privacy

About Us


TheWeekInCongress.com (TM)

Week Ending October 5, 2007

 

H.R.3068 To prohibit the award of contracts to provide guard services under the contract security guard program of the Federal Protective Service to a business concern that is owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony.

 

The Secretary of Homeland Security may not award a contract for provision of guard services under the contract security guard program of the Federal Protective Service to any business concern that is owned, controlled or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony. The Secretary would have six months to issue regulations in that regard.

 

The need for the bill is the result findings from two investigative hearings. DHS had proposed to cut the presence of FPS officers nationally. The hearings discovered DHS’ increased use of contract security guards to protect and respond to threats at Federal buildings as the PFS staff is decreased. The second hearing uncovered that one security company was run by a individual convicted of fraud who had not paid his security guards leading to a potential security risk in Federal buildings.

 

The original bill also required the Secretary to cancel any contracts if it is discovered that they violate this act, however, that provision was removed in committee.

 

Sponsor:  Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)

Vote: Passed House by voice vote September 2, 2007

Cost to the taxpayers: CBO estimates that implementing this legislation would have no significant cost and would not affect direct spending or revenues

Earmark Certification:   Not applicable to this bill.

## All Rights Reserved. © 2007 TheWeekInCongress.com(TM)

No reproduction, language translation or distribution without written permission from TheWeekInCongress.com.(TM)

 

MORE INFORMATION

 

 

## All Rights Reserved. © 2007 TheWeekInCongress.com.(TM)

No reproduction, language translation or distribution without written permission from TheWeekInCongress.com.(TM)