Off-site Links

GET TO KNOW WHO REPRESENTS YOU

A New Wiki with Data on Lawmakers.

Who is Receiving Federal Loans & Grants?

OpenSecrets.Org

Who's Giving Money to Your Elected Officials?

PRESS

RESOURCES

National and International Resources We Use

PollingReport.com

Does Your Opinion

Match the Polls?


Legislation News & Report (TM) 

TheWeekInCongress.com (TM)

Managing America: House / Senate Procedures


 Home

Contact: House / Senate

Newest Public Laws

Monthly  Budget Review

Features

Contact Us

Legal

Previous Edition

Search & Research

Archives

Legislation in the Spotlight

Privacy

About Us


TheWeekInCongress.com (TM)

Week Ending June 22, 2007

 

H.RES.491 Providing for earmark reform.

 

The resolution was crafted following extensive negotiations between House Majority and Minority Leaders on June 14th and 15th. A handshake agreement on June 15th suggested that earmarks would be identified in appropriation bills when those bills came to the House floor for debate.

 

This resolution provides for identifying earmarks and their sponsors in bill conference reports when those reports return to the House for a final vote on passage of the bill. Conference reports reflect changes to the final version of a bill after it has passed the House and Senate and then went to a House Senate conference to iron out any differences.

 

No conference report accompanying a regular general appropriation bill can be considered by the 110th Congress unless the joint explanatory statement prepared by the bill’s mangers in the House and Senate includes a list of congressional earmarks that that were not committed to the conference committee by either House, not in a report on the bill, and not in a report of a committee of the Senate on a companion measure.

 

Simplistically, the resolution aims to identify earmarks put in appropriation bills during conference committee negotiations on large bills that have, in the past, come back to the House and Senate with the unidentified earmarks within and were then passed.

 

The resolution prohibits considering a rule on debating the bill or an order that waives the requirement that the earmarks be listed. The bill would be subject to a point of order.

 

Sponsor:  Rep Steny Hoyer (D-MD-5th)

Vote: Agreed to in the House without objection June 18, 2007

Cost to the taxpayers: No discernible cost

Earmark Certification:   Not applicable to this resolution.

## All Rights Reserved. © 2007 TheWeekInCongress.com(TM)

No reproduction, language translation or distribution without written permission from TheWeekInCongress.com.(TM)

 

MORE INFORMATION

H. Res. 491

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

June 18, 2007.

Resolved, That during the remainder of the 110th Congress it shall not be in order to consider a conference report to accompany a regular general appropriation bill unless the joint explanatory statement prepared by the managers on the part of the House and the managers on the part of the Senate includes a list of congressional earmarks (as that term is used in clause 9(d) of rule XXI) in the conference report or joint statement (and the name of any Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, or Senator who submitted a request to the respective House or Senate committee for each respective item included on such list) that were not committed to the conference committee by either House, not in a report on such bill, and not in a report of a committee of the Senate on a companion measure.

Sec. 2. It shall not be in order to consider a rule or order that waives the application of the first section of this resolution.

Sec. 3. A point of order under this resolution shall be disposed of by the question of consideration under the same terms as specified in clause 9(b) of rule XXI.

Attest:

Clerk.

 

## All Rights Reserved. © 2007 TheWeekInCongress.com.(TM)

No reproduction, language translation or distribution without written permission from TheWeekInCongress.com.(TM)